Non-profit organisations in SingaporeSeems like they're going to the pits.
I don't begrudge TT Durai his $25,000 a month salary. It may seem grossly excessive for a non-profit org, but how else will they be able to get quality management if they can't offer salaries on par with those in the private sector? Of course, this necessarily begs the question of whether management calibre equal to that in the private sector is needed for the NKF to function, but that's not the main point here. What most people take offense to is the revelation that Durai is paid a grossly handsome 10-to-12 month bonus.
Excuse me, but I always thought, with my limited working experience, that bonuses are usually pegged to the profits earned by a company in a financial year? And supposedly non-profit orgs have some other way of compensating their employees for this, such as the civil service, which dispenses one-month bonuses? Maybe I'm ignorant for even asking this, but do the management at corporate giants like SIA, Venture Corp, HP or Philips get paid such big bonuses?
Seems deplorable and infinitely disgusting that it takes 60,000 ordinary working folks like me and most everyone else to donate 10 bucks each, before we finish paying off Durai's salary. Then who knows how many hundreds of thousands of us must continue to pay 10 bucks each again, before we finish paying off the rest of the NKF staff's salaries and our money finally starts reaching those who really need it.
What really irked me were the comments made by a certain prominent lady NKF patron, also the wife of a certain local political luminary. In today's TNP, she was reported to have said, "What does SPH have to gain from this lawsuit?" Well excuse me, duh, NKF brought the lawsuit against SPH, not the other way round. What a freaking idiotic comment to ask. Another comment she reportedly made was something to the effect that all NKF wanted to achieve with the lawsuit was for SPH to retract certain defamatory paragraphs that gave readers erroneous impressions, and why did SPH have to blow up the whole matter into one of NKF's transparency. My gawd, that's an even more stupid comment. If NKF had done nothing wrong and was above board in all its conduct and dealings, then what did it matter even if SPH had pursued the issue of its transparency during the suit?
Madam, you're probably one of the precious few left in Singapore who continue to have steadfast trust in NKF. Most of the rest of the people must be furious, and who can blame them? First the blardy PTC approved the public transport service providers' requests to raise the fares of public transport, when the standards and quality of service had dropped so awfully that you have to wait at least 15 minutes for a feeder bus during peak hours; then the cab companies decide to raise peak hour flag-down rates from $2.40 to $4.00, when their rogue drivers cause accidents and deaths with their hooliganish and fucking dangerous driving. Then such a high-profile misuse of public donations at one of Singapore's most iconic charity organisations. Add on to this the fact that year after year we are told to bear with higher taxes and low or non-increasing salaries and bonuses because of the lousy economy. No wonder Singaporeans are getting so cynical and dispassionate about our country. I'm starting to pine after the kangaroos and didgeridoos in Oz myself, sheesh.
Face/Off the MediaCorp wayMediaCorp Press, okay, TODAY, ran an interesting article today, a departure from its usual competent but fairly run-of-the-mill editorial. Nothing intellectual, mostly good fun, but quite cute and attention-grabbing, an interesting twist on the Project Superstar saga on Channel U.
Instead of profiling the latest finalists to make it through to the next round, they zeroed in on deciphering the puzzling technical terms proffered by the judges, especially Lee Wei Song and Xu Huan Liang. Namely, 'head voice', 'chest voice' 'qi yin', 'groove' and a whole host of others. Of course, coming from a choral background though not at all distinguished myself, these terms are rather simplistic and basic but I have realised that many audience members are unaware of their meanings.
At home, my parents badger me about what the terms mean and I don't know how to explain to them, especially to a father who is so utterly tone-deaf and music-averse that back in primary school he'd rather fail music than to sing the school song in front of the teacher. At work, when my colleagues gossip about the show, their favourite topic aside from bashing a particularly showy and irritatingly 'fake'female contestant, is inadvertently the judges' comments. And sure enough, when I ask them what they didn't understand, they always say 'head voice', 'nasal' and the likes of which the judges like to bombard the contestants with.
My verdict: A fun, light-hearted read to perk up your mornings. Could have done with more examples, but excellent still! A good lesson for me in what my editor always says about putting a fresh new spin on an old topic.
Then later at night, I was watching this new Channel 8 drama starring Michelle Cheah, Joanne Peh, Huang Wen Yong, Ix Shen and others. Michelle's character was so utterly boring and 2-dimensional that you wonder if she was still under instructions to reprise her absolutely infamous and horrible Turn-Back-The-Clock Lux advertisement. Ix was cast in the same mould and that's no surprise, since his acting chops are solely in his delectable body and abs. Too bad he walks around in a dumpy polo tee and berms most of the time in the show. Seems like MediaCorp also likes to build in these slightly idiot-esque characters in their latest shows, such as Mo Jing Jing (Jeanette Aw) in He Lan Cun, then Pierre Png's character in Tong Xin Yuan and now, Ix Shen in this new show. I think it's a curse. I think they end up looking and speaking like idiots even after filming, just look at Jeanette Aw in the Soo Kee ads.
One of the things I can't stand about the show is that it later pairs Michelle with Wen Yong, brrrrrr, what a gross pairing. I mean, when he made his TV debut in Wu Suo Nan Yang way way back, Michelle was probably still in Pampers and bottle-feeding. Talk about mismatch. Yuck.
And then, the storyline seems vaguely reminiscent of Korean dramas. Girl's parents die in her childhood, girl is brought up by a foster family, brothers in the foster family fall in love with her, yadah yadah... So, the only way to get out of this is to make her fall in love with some other guy right? So in comes Tay Ping Hui. Or so I guess lah. What do I know right, maybe it turns out to be a blockbuster that will be screened in the whole of China at 3am in the mornings.
Never mind. I'm no expert on the broadcast media. Would any media research executives like to comment?